Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume I. Organization and Procedures. Approved by the Secretary General and published under his authority. The Airworthiness Manual (Doc ) was first published in in two volumes and contained a consolidation of airworthiness-related information previously. Doc AN Airworthiness Manual. Volume II. Design Certification and. Continuing Airworthiness. Approved by the Secretary General.
|Country:||Republic of Macedonia|
|Published (Last):||18 August 2014|
|PDF File Size:||20.86 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||16.10 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Continuing Airworthiness is therefore not just the maintenance of aircraft and equipment, but also involves monitoring performance of products in service. Key coordinated efforts have been sponsored by:.
Aidworthiness national military airworthiness authority of a state responsible for the airworthiness of the military aircraft of that state. The recognition process follows four basic phases:.
Source for ICAO Airworthiness Manual (doc 9760)
It remains the responsibility of the TAA to account for any differences in standards and processes, and to decide how any identified gaps are to be managed. Retrieved from ” https: The generic term for any of the following: Once the regulatory Section Heads have completed their reviews, they provide a summary of their findings to DTAES 2, who collates them into a preliminary report.
Recognition can be unilateral, bilateral or multilateral. Furthermore, there is no single, internationally recognized organization manuwl sets airrworthiness or harmonizes the military airworthiness and aviation requirements of MAAs.
TAA Advisory – Recognition of Airworthiness Authorities
Other military regulators may be organized differently, for example: Depending on how it is structured within the state, the airworthiness authority may be established as a sub-component of the larger Civil Airworthinesss Authority.
The government statutory authority in each country that oversees the approval and regulation of civil aviation. Recognition of Airworthiness Authorities Effective Date: This is an approved organisation responsible for implementation of continuing airworthiness management tasks.
To enable the provisions of these two TAM chapters, there is a requirement to identify the other regulatory authorities that are acceptable to the TAA and detail the methodology used to establish acceptability. This also includes acceptance of FAA organizational approvals related to maintenance, design, manufacturing and materiel support services for civil-derived aeronautical products.
ICAO DOC 9760
For the purpose of this advisory, an airworthiness artefact is a work product from a military or civil airworthiness authority. Within a military organization, airworthiness and aviation responsibility may be spread across a number of organizations, and enforcement may only be possible through internal regulations, rules and contracts.
As stated in para 4. Cranfield University Publication Authority: In the words of ICAO:. If you wish to contribute or participate in the discussions about articles you are invited to join SKYbrary as a registered user. Cranfield University Content control: TAM Part 2, Chapter 5 — Type Design Examination TDE describes the rules and standards for the acceptance of work performed, and airworthiness artefacts issued, by other airworthiness authorities in relation to initial type certification airworthines major design change approval.
The process by which the TAA will undertake this recognition could include: It is useful to compare Continued and Continuing as they are sometimes used interchangeably.
Airworthiness manual in SearchWorks catalog
The scope of recognition is limited to those airworthiness functions that dof within the assigned responsibility of the respective AA. Terms, conditions and sustainment requirements are normally articulated in a recognition certificate and the supporting documentation. For each of its aircraft, the approved CAMO is required to carry out the following functions.
Timely response is required where airworthiness is affected, which means devising and provisioning rectification action, and promulgating the necessary information to restore safety levels. DTAES 2 maintains a record of individual evaluator findings and airwprthiness with the AA being assessed to build a schedule for the onsite review. The report provides an overall assessment of acceptability and identifies any areas that require clarification through an onsite review.
While airworthinss review process includes both a desktop and an onsite review, the output of the desktop review can be sufficiently comprehensive to preclude the requirement for the onsite review. Finally, in the military context, recognition can improve flexibility and capacity during joint operations.