DoDAF has been designed to meet the specific business and operational needs DoDAF V is a more focused approach to supporting decision-makers than. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF) is an architecture framework for . On May 28, DoDAF v was approved by the Department of Defense. The current version is DoDAF DoDAF V is published on a. Description. Mapping of DoDAF V Views to DoDAF V Viewpoints. Source. DoD Architecture Framework Version Date. May 28, Author. DoD.

Author: Nelabar Kazram
Country: Thailand
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Life
Published (Last): 27 December 2012
Pages: 242
PDF File Size: 13.30 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.4 Mb
ISBN: 363-8-75301-257-8
Downloads: 86350
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Fegami

File:DoDAF-V2.0-Viewpoints3.jpg

Capability Phasing Planned achievement of capability at different points in time or during specific periods of time. The relationship between architecture data elements across the SV to the OV can be exemplified as systems are procured and fielded to support organizations and their operations.

Models Descriptions SysV-7 Systems Performance Parameters Matrix Performance characteristics of Systems Model elements for the appropriate time frame s SysV-8 Systems Evolution Description Planned incremental steps toward migrating a dodsf of systems to a more efficient suite, or toward evolving a current system to a future implementation. Registration Forgot your password?

The DM2 defines architectural data elements and enables the integration and federation of Architectural Descriptions. The approach depends on the requirements and the vodaf results; i.

Operational Activity Model Capabilities, operational activities, relationships among activities, inputs, and outputs; overlays can show cost, performers or other pertinent information OV-6a: DoDAF has a meta-model underpinning the framework, defining the types of modelling elements that can be used in each view and the relationships between them.

Technical standards view TV products define technical standards, implementation conventions, business rules and criteria that govern the architecture. Feedback Privacy Policy Feedback. This document addressed usage, integrated architectures, DoD and Federal policies, value of architectures, architecture measures, DoD decision support processes, development techniques, analytical techniques, and the CADM v1. It establishes data element definitions, rules, and relationships and a baseline set of products for consistent development of systems, integrated, or federated architectures.

  2SC3039 DATASHEET PDF

Operational View OV products provide descriptions of the tasks and activities, operational elements, and information exchanges required to accomplish DoD missions.

File: – Wikipedia

This information is otherwise intended solely for the use and information of the client to whom it is addressed. A capability thread would equate to the specific activities, rules, and systems that are linked to that particular capability. Please verify that this file is suitable for Commons before transferring it. While it is clearly aimed at military systems, DoDAF has broad applicability across the private, public and voluntary sectors around the world, and represents one of a large number of systems architecture frameworks.

The DoDAF deskbook provides examples in using traditional systems engineering and data engineering techniques, and secondly, UML format. It defines the type of information exchanged, the frequency of exchanges, the tasks and activities supported by these exchanges and the nature of the exchanges.

DoD weapons and information technology system acquisitions are required to develop and document an enterprise architecture EA using the views prescribed in the DoDAF.

These views are artifacts for visualizing, understanding, and assimilating the broad scope and complexities of an architecture description through tabularstructuralbehavioralontologicalpictorialtemporalgraphicalprobabilisticor alternative conceptual means. The sequence of the artifacts listed below gives a suggested order in which the artifacts could be developed. File mover What files should be renamed? The developing system must not only meet its internal data needs but also those of the operational framework into which it is set.

PD Public domain false false. The Department of Defense Architecture Framework DoDAF is an architecture framework for the United States Department of Defense DoD that provides visualization infrastructure for specific stakeholders concerns through viewpoints organized by various views. Department of Defense for developing enterprise architecture has been debated:. Project Portfolio Relationships Organizational structures needed to manage a portfolio of projects and shows dependency relationships between the organizations and projects.

  ANIMAL BEHAVIOR DRICKAMER PDF

Models Descriptions SvcV-8 Services Evolution Description Planned incremental steps toward migrating a suite of systems to a more efficient suite, or toward evolving a current services to a future implementation.

File:DoDAF-V2.0-Viewpoints.jpg

These architecture descriptions may include families of systems FoSsystems of systems SoSand net-centric capabilities for interoperating and interacting in the non-combat environment. Prior to retirement from the Federal Government inMr. The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file pages on other projects are not listed:. Integrated architectures are a property or design principle for architectures at all levels: All view AV products provide overarching descriptions of f2.0 entire architecture and define the scope and context of the architecture.

Department of Defense Architecture Framework – Wikipedia

Product Descriptions” and a “Deskbook”. What are we doing with this version? Capability Dependencies Dependencies between planned capabilities and defines logical groupings of capabilities. Views Read Edit View history. Retrieved from ” https: Definitions and Guidelines”, “II: This Architecture Framework is especially suited to large systems with complex integration and interoperability challenges, and it is apparently unique in its employment of “operational views”.

In April the Version 1. Auth with social network: The Capability Models describe capability taxonomy and capability evolution. The three views and their interrelationships — driven by common architecture data elements — provide the basis for deriving measures such as interoperability or performance, and for measuring the impact of the values of these metrics on operational mission and task effectiveness.