: Las Dos Babilonias (Spanish Edition) () by Alexander Hislop and a great selection of similar New, Used and Collectible Books. Las Dos Babilonias: Alexander Hislop: Books – Las Dos Babilonias by Alexander Hislop at – ISBN – ISBN – CreateSpace Independent Publishing .

Author: Durisar Tazilkree
Country: Myanmar
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Technology
Published (Last): 24 October 2014
Pages: 326
PDF File Size: 5.22 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.18 Mb
ISBN: 617-1-34660-151-3
Downloads: 69623
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Felrajas

In the “Institutes of Menu,” he is characterised as “He whom the mind alone can perceive; whose essence eludes the external organs, who has no visible parts, who exists from eternity Back Table of Contents Forward moza butterfly. Zero, in this sense, had evidently come from the Chaldee, zer”to encompass,” from which, also, no doubt, was derived the Babylonian name for a great cycle of time, called a ” saros.

But in so doing he is entirely inconsistent, for he admits that Brahma, the first person in that triform image, is identified with the supreme Brahm; and further, that a curse is pronounced upon all who distinguish between Brahma, Vishnu, and Seva, the three divinities represented by that image.

While this had been the original way in which Pagan idolatry had represented the Triune God, and though this kind of representation had survived to Sennacherib’s time, yet there is evidence that, at a very early period, an important change had taken place in the Babylonian notions in regard to the divinity; and that the three persons had come to be, the Eternal Father, the Spirit of God incarnate in a human mother, and a Divine Son, the fruit of that incarnation.

Backend ddos did not respond in time. While overlaid with idolatry, the recognition of a Trinity was universal in all the ancient nations of the world, proving how deep-rooted in the human race was the primeval doctrine on this subject, which comes out so distinctly in Genesis.

Kennedy objects to the application of the name “Eko Deva” to the triform image in the cave-temple at Elephanta, on the ground that that name babilonis only to the supreme Brahm. It evidently meant that He who, ever since the fall, has been revealed to man as the “Merciful and Gracious One” Exo The identity of Nimrod with the constellation Orion is not to be rejected.

One of the heads is like the ordinary pictures of our Saviour. The ancient Icelandic mythology calls him “the Author of every thing that existeth, the eternal, the living, and awful Being; the searcher into concealed things, the Being that never changeth. But if the supreme divinity in almost all ancient heathen nations was triune, the futility of this objection must be manifest. Most other nations did the same. It is well known that the Brahmins, to exalt themselves as a priestly, half-divine caste, to whom all others ought aelxander bow down, have for many ages taught that, while the other doss came from the arms, and body and feet of Brahma–the visible representative and manifestation of the invisible Brahm, and identified hkslop him– they alone came from the mouth of the creative God.

Now we find such language applied to Brahm, the one supreme God, as cannot be accounted for, except on the supposition that Brahm had the very same meaning as the Hebrew Rahm. Major Moor, speaking of Brahm, the supreme God of the Hindoos, says: Layard regards the circle in that figure as signifying “Time without bounds. In India, the supreme divinity, in like manner, in one of the most ancient cave-temples, is represented with three heads on one body, under the name of “Eko Deva Trimurtti,” “One God, three forms.

  JLG 500RTS PDF

But yet, even as the geologist, by examining the contents of a fissure here, an upheaval there, and what “crops out” of itself on the surface elsewhere, is enabled to determine, with wonderful certainty, the order and general contents of the different strata over all the alexancer, so is it with the subject of the Hoslop Mysteries. Some have said that the plural form of the name of God, in the Hebrew of Genesis, affords no argument of the doctrine of plurality of persons in the Godhead, because the same word in the plural is applied to heathen divinities.

Las Dos Babilonias (spanish Edition) Alexander Hislop | eBay

Now we find statements in their sacred books which prove that once a very different doctrine must have been taught. Here, then, we find that Brahm is just the same as “Er-Rahman,” “The all-merciful one,”–a title applied by the Turks to the Most High, and that the Hindoos, notwithstanding their deep religious degradation nowhad once known that “the most holy, most high God,” is also “The God of Mercy,” in other words, that he is “a just God and a Saviour.

There has been a great deal of unsatisfactory speculation in regard to the meaning of this name, but when the different statements in regard to Brahm are carefully considered, it becomes evident that the name Brahm is just the Hebrew Rahm, with the digamma prefixed, which is very frequent in Sanscrit words derived from Hebrew or Chaldee.

If there be this general coincidence between the systems of Babylon and Rome, the question arises, Does the coincidence stop here?

Now, as the language of Jeremiah, already quoted, would indicate that Babylon was the primal source from which all these systems of idolatry flowed, so the deductions of the most learned historians, on mere historical grounds have led to the same conclusion.

And here I have to notice, first, the identity of the objects of worship in Babylon and Rome. Alexandeg whence can we have derived this term but from the Arabians, as they, babiloinas doubt, had themselves derived it from the Chaldees, the grand original cultivators at once of arithmetic, geometry, and idolatry?

Las Dos Babilonias – Alexander Hislop.pdf

Layard, in his last alexabder, has given a specimen of such a triune divinity, worshipped in ancient Assyria.

We think it must be painful to any Christian mind, and repugnant to Christian feeling, to look at this figure. When we look at the symbols in the triune figure of Layard, already referred to, and minutely examine them, they are very instructive.

We have only to bring the ancient Babylonian Mysteries to bear on the whole system of Rome, and then it will be seen how immensely the one has borrowed from the other. The other is the head of an old man, surmounted by a triangle. What is wanted in one country is supplemented in another; and what actually “crops out” in different directions, to a large extent necessarily determines the character of much that does not directly appear on the surface.

Nay, not merely had the ancient Hindoos exalted bislop of the natural perfections of God, but there is evidence that they were well aware of the gracious character of God, as revealed in His dealings with a lost and guilty world. All these separate facts–all these scattered testimonies, recur to that fruitful principle which places in the East the centre of science and civilisation.

  LA SETTIMANA ENIGMISTICA 4260 PDF

It obtained the epithet of perfectand was believed to be the most ancient of religious systems, having preceded that of the Egyptians. Now to establish the identity between the systems of ancient Babylon and Papal Rome, we have just to inquire in how far does the system of the Papacy agree with the system established in these Babylonian Mysteries.

But there is reason to believe that “Deva” has a much more honourable origin, and that it really came originally from the Chaldee, Thav”good,” which is also legitimately pronounced Thev banilonias, and in the emphatic form is Theva or Thevo”The Good.

But how little weight is in this, may be seen from the fact that it is this very term “Achad,” and that without the article, that is used in Deuteronomy, when the Hisop of the Godhead is asserted in the most emphatic babillnias, “Hear, O Israel, Jehovah our God is one Jehovah,” i.

In both cases such a comparison is most degrading to the King Eternal, and is fitted utterly to pervert the minds of those who contemplate it, as if there was or could be any similitude between such a figure and Hisop who hath bbabilonias, “To whom will ye liken God, and what likeness will ye compare unto Him?

Taking, then, the admitted unity and Babylonian character of the ancient Mysteries of Egypt, Greece, Phoenicia, and Rome, as the clue to guide us in our researches, let us go on from step to step in our comparison of the doctrine and practice of the two Babylons–the Babylon of the Old Testament and the Babylon of the New.

Alexaander Papacy has alsxander some of its churches, as, for instance, in the monastery of the so-called Trinitarians of Madrid, an image of the Triune God, with three heads on one body. Macrobius shows that the distinguishing feature of the Phoenician idolatry must have been imported from Assyria, which, in classic writers, included Babylonia.

In Japan, the Buddhists worship their great divinity, Hjslop, with dis heads, in the very same form, under the name of “San Pao Fuh. Hence, from Dheva or Theva”The Good,” naturally comes the Sanscrit, Devaor, without the digamma, as it frequently is, Deoalexahder the Latin, Deusand the Greek, Theosthe digamma in the original Thevo-s being also dropped, as novus in Latin is neos in Greek.

The Two Babylons: Trinity in Unity

Though modern Hinduism recognises millions of gods, yet the Indian sacred books show that originally it had been far otherwise. Out of the middle of this figure is proceeding the Holy Ghost in the form of a dove. Both Bunsen and Layard in their researches have come to substantially the same result. To this the answer is, Far otherwise. He “illumines all, delights all, whence all proceeded; that by which they live when born, and that to which all must return” Veda.

So utterly idolatrous was the Babylonian recognition of the Divine unity, that Jehovah, the Living God, severely condemned His own people for giving any countenance to it: This view of the matter gives an emphasis to the saying of our Lord Matt Rahm in Hebrew hisloo “The merciful or compassionate one.