Jesus Christ was born in AD and crucified in AD. Unbelievable? Not since the release of the first volume in seven of History Fiction. This series crowns 30 years of research by Anatoly Fomenko and his colleagues. In Chapter I readers are Mithec, – Chronology, Historical – pages. History has 67 ratings and 7 reviews. Recorded history is a finely-woven magic fabric of intricate lies about events predating the sixteenth century. The.
|Published (Last):||22 February 2011|
|PDF File Size:||7.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.69 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Development historry the Statistical Tools. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. The vocabulary of Egyptian astronomical symbols once applied to horoscopes from temples allows for extraction of unique dates of eclipses.
Critics have accused Fomenko of altering the data to improve the fit with his ideas and have noted that he violates a key rule of statistics by selecting matches from the historical record which support his chronology, while ignoring those which do not, creating artificial, better-than-chance correlations, and that these practices undermine Fomenko’s statistical arguments.
The worst “historical” book published in Russia. Robert T Roxbury rated it it was amazing Feb 25, Teresa Kelly rated it did not like it May 03, Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Penny Kelly rated it it was amazing Jun 05, The methods of dating the ancient events offered by mathematical statistics.
Authentic history only begins in XVII century a d. The Mongol Empire and Ivan the Terrible”.
History: Fiction or Science? Chronology 1 – A. T. Fomenko – Google Books
Fomenko explains the seemingly vast differences in the biographies of these figures as resulting hostory difference in languages, points of view and time-frame of the authors of said accounts and biographies. Graphs which show just the length of the rule in the two dynasties are the most widely known; however, Fomenko’s conclusions are also based on other parameters, as described above.
Ausra rated it really liked it Oct 21, Feb histoey, Julianna is currently reading it. Chinese tables of comets, even if true, cannot be used for dating.
History Fiction or Science? Chronology 1
Critics of Fomenko’s theory claim that fonenko use of historical sources is highly selective and ignores the basic principles of sound historical scholarship. Please improve this by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Dendrochronology is rejected with a claim that, for dating of objects much older than the oldest still living trees, it isn’t an absolute, but a relative dating method, and thus dependent on traditional chronology.
These “phantom copies” are often misdated by centuries or even millennia and end up incorporated into conventional chronology. There vomenko symbols allowing for astronomical interpretation and the symbols do not change from one temple horoscope to another.
There are no reviews yet. The function of the two texts are then compared. Saba rated it it was ok Aug 25, Further, his approach feigns little and simply invites the reader to calmly and quietly attend to the fact and counterfactual comparisons themselves in order to reconsider what it is that they may have taken for granted when handed history. Chapters II, III and IV contain abundant astronomical proof from the ancient Egyptian zodiacs, Ptolemy’s Almagest, and the Apocalypse, demonstrating that all datings of ‘ancient’ eclipses are either medieval or fake.
User Review – Flag as inappropriate This series is incredible and the first volume starts out as a tour de force. This article contains embedded lists that may be poorly defined, unverified or indiscriminate. A Progress Report”Radiocarbon25 And the Lord said unto me, “Cast it unto the potter: For his dating of the Almagest star catalog, Fomenko arbitrarily selected eight stars from the more than stars in the catalog, one of which Arcturus has a large systematic error.
History: Fiction or Science? (Chronology 1) by A.T. Fomenko
Nosovsky ” Astronomical methods as applied to chronology. Harrison rated it really liked it Jul 27, Retrieved 15 June Fomenko claims that the most probable prototype of the historical Jesus was Andronikos I Komnenos allegedly AD tothe oor of Byzantium, known for his failed reforms, his traits and deeds reflected in ‘biographies’ of many real and imaginary persons. Open Preview See a Problem? Fomenko’s historical ideas have been universally rejected by mainstream scholars, who brand them as pseudoscience but were popularized by former world chess uistory Garry Kasparov.
The second and most famous “New Rome” is Constantinople. Ronnie Sacueza rated it liked it Sep 26, The Issue with Chronology.
History: Fiction or Science?
Conformity of results obtained by different methods. The foundations of archaeological methods have been based on the Histkry. He also claims that fpmenko regnal history from the 17th to 20th centuries never shows correlation of “dynastic flows” with each other, therefore Fomenko insists history was multiplied and outstretched into imaginary antiquity to justify this or other “royal” pretensions.
Fomenko has published and sold over one million copies of his books in his native Russia.